The Question Behind the Question
Every question someone asks you is also a statement about how they think. Learning to hear the structure behind the content changes what you can do with the conversation.
These are written as observations rather than essays — notes from the practice of making behaviour observable. Each one starts with something specific and stays specific.
Published notes — practical guides on values, meta programs, the Meta Model, the Milton Model and more — are on the Notes page.
Note: The articles below are in progress. Full text is being written — each excerpt represents the article’s actual direction. They will be published as they are completed.
Every question someone asks you is also a statement about how they think. Learning to hear the structure behind the content changes what you can do with the conversation.
Advice assumes the other person’s decision-making structure is the same as yours. It almost never is. Here’s what to do instead.
Feeling stuck isn’t the absence of options. It’s a specific internal configuration — a pattern of beliefs, values, and representations maintaining the current position. The configuration is observable.
‘I don’t know’ is almost never literally true. It usually means: I haven’t accessed it yet, I don’t want to say, or I don’t have language for it. Each one requires a different response.
The instinct is to fix the behaviour. The more useful move is to find the structure producing it. Change the structure, and the behaviour changes as a side effect.
You can know a principle intellectually and still not have it available when you need it. The gap between knowing and understanding is a gap of internal representation, not information.
One useful observation about human behaviour, language, or decision-making — sent when there’s something worth saying. Unsubscribe any time.